So you just have to find an OM mount adapter !
...Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus
[mailto:olympus-bounces+wayne.harridge=structuregraphs.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
] On Behalf Of Ken Norton
Sent: Sunday, 15 January 2017 11:12 AM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] Droids - The Sequel
I did some tests, shooting raw images and processing them in Lightroom. The
Hasselblad camera module does have a decent lens--especially at longer focal
lengths, but the sensor is a bit lack-luster. While the built-in sensor is
as close to state-of-the-art as I've seen in a cellphone, the Hasselblad
module's sensor is significantly behind. I will have no regrets when I
return it to the store.
But the in-phone camera is right up there and when you shoot raw, it's
impressive. 100% pixel-peeping is sharp to the pixel and there's 21 million
of them. Best of all, almost no CA or PF at all.
I know that DxOMark has the Google Pixel and even the S7 as a higher rated
camera, but I really don't think so when you dive down into raw pixels. The
in-camera processing of the other two are better, but the sensor and camera
of the moto Z Force is better.
AG Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|