On 12/30/2016 1:10 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
Thanks for looking Fluttering Moose. Certainly you are correct about a bit too
narrow dof with the distal part of the forewing and antennae and perhaps all
the issues.
It is clear I did not perfectly parallel the subject either. It was odd though
that I could see the scales on he hind wing yet the wing detail was blurred. I
did clean that up as best I could with R-L deconvolution.
So what I see is post clean-up, and my conclusions might be suspect. But, hey,
that's all I had to go on.
The critter was quiet but postulated the ambient exposure was a tad blurred due
to cam motion yet the scales visible from the short flash exposure. Perhaps
not. I really love stacked flutterby shots when they work--I think you said
the E-M5II can even stack with flash
Not really suitable for most live subjects. It is indeed possible to set a delay between shots for flash recharge, but
then a stack takes quite some time. Another case where continuous light might be better.
It's hard to describe how freeing and flexible is it to hold a light, cool, powerful light source in one hand, adjusting
brightness and angle as desired.
--just not with Big Foot. :-(
Yeah, I'm encountering a similar problem just now myself.
Have a great New Year and I trust Carol will be fluttering about normally soon.
More steps, literally, have been taken. She had her first physical therapy session Wednesday. She can now 'walk' with a
walker, so she only puts maybe 25% weight on that foot, still in its walking support boot. Pretty exciting stuff, seeing
her walk by this morning.
All forward from here.
Alternative Light Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|