On 12/30/2016 1:31 AM, Philippe wrote:
In my younger years, 135mm WAS the portrait lens for 24x36 cameras.
Everyone wanted one :-)
Me too.
I had a Takumar 2.8 I think, which I loved.
Then a Zuiko,
Etc.
I must have missed that memo. Do you suppose it was you - or I - who was experiencing a different portrait lens milieu
back then? Local vs. global? America vs. Europe?
I did, in fact, make some portraits I quite liked by catching people unaware with my 80-200 zoom at/near the long end,
but at some subject angles, perspective compression was a problem. Profiles were best, as I recall.
I do have the OMZ 135 lenses, but seldom found use for them. The f2.8 seemed great for the combination of reach and
speed, in theory . . .
Short Tele Challenged Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|