Thanks for that information, Ken. I find the Capture One working environment
far superior to that of SilkyPix; it has its shortcomings, such as limited
metadata input at the import state, but I feel more comfortable using C1 than
LR (and than Aperture, now it’s so old).
So, even at that “deal” price, I won’t be trying SilkyPix again.
Chris
> On 28 Sep 16, at 15:00, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The raw converter is just like that. The raw converter is the
> photography equivalent to the mic pre-amp and A-D converter. It only
> makes sense that some companies have better ones than others. The
> Adobe CC suite is very very good, in most ways, but the one weakness
> is in the raw converter. Products, like SilkyPIX and Capture One, have
> superior raw converters, but inferior working environments.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|