YOLO Chuck ;-). The 12-40mm instantly became my favourite m43 lens. It is
that good, and still portable enough.
2016-09-02 16:34 GMT+02:00 Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I think I've pretty well adapted to the slower lenses and not been tempted
> by any of the Pro versions. I suspect the 12-100/4 will not be much
> different in size/weight than the 12-40/2.8 which is close to 14 oz.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 9/1/2016 3:55 PM, Moose wrote:
>
>> On 9/1/2016 12:46 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>> It must be getting close. B&H sent me an offer this morning for $300
>>> off the E-M1 (Mk 1). I'll be in line to get one when it arrives...
>>> assuming the price is similar to the original Mk 1 price ($1,199.99)
>>>
>>
>> I will probably be torn. I'd like the latest features, but don't like
>> the size and shape I'm expecting, compared to the svelte E-M5 II.
>>
>> I'm more excited about the 12-100/4 Pro, but afraid it will be too big
>> and heavy. I'm already carrying around the Panny 100-400. Add another
>> big bertha, and I'll either become like Edward Weston about distance
>> from the car, or start looking like a navvy.
>>
>> No Porter Moose
>>
>> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|