That is exactly my point. It is about enabling multiple purposes. If you
have a smaller camera that you can extend with a hand grip or if that is
not enough an additional battery vertical grip, you can adapt to the lens
you want to use at that time.
However a big body without the option to go small is unnecessary limiting
imho.
2016-09-02 15:26 GMT+02:00 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Actually, I expect >$1500 for the E-M1 Mk2. The market is shrinking and
> the
> > response of the big brands seems to be more expensive camera's. Sony
> > leading the pack with the A7R II and Canon's new 5D Mk 4 is quite
> expensive
> > too. I fear Olympus is not immune to the loudly lunatics who wants bigger
> > camera's without the option to go smaller as well. We'll see.
>
> I'm not so concerned about big or small as long as it is the "right
> size" for the purpose. The 6D is the smallest of the full-frame DSLRs,
> but it is still larger than an OM film body. While the 6D is the
> "right size" for the OMZ 35-80 zoom, it isn't the "right size" for an
> OMZ 35/2.8 lens. But the OM-4T is the "right size" for the OMZ 35/2.8,
> but not for the OMZ 35-80, unless you are using a motordrive.
>
> AG (right sized) Schnozz
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|