Thanks, Chuck. I’ll read the whole article now that I’m reassured of our
success, albeit temporary :-)
Chris
> On 1 Sep 16, at 13:23, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ah, but if you would read about the battle you would see that you didn't lose
> (that one at least). The British had an overwhelming naval force. Arnold
> knew that we would lose and we lost badly. But his real aim was a delaying
> tactic and that was successful. You also gained Arnold as a brigadier
> general when he defected to the British side in 1780. The Continental
> Congress had treated him rather badly.
>
> On 8/30/2016 9:03 AM, ChrisB wrote:
>> That’s an impressive looking place, Chuck. But I don’t want to read
>> about a battle if we lost :-)
>>
>> Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|