Subject: | Re: [OM] Image resolution |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 19 May 2016 20:50:59 -0400 |
Yup, I tend to forget about that high altitude stuff. My altitude is
about 25 feet. UV is not a problem here but storm surge might be. :-)
Chuck Norcutt On 5/19/2016 4:31 PM, Moose wrote: On 5/18/2016 6:55 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:What filter is over the lens? Why? The only two filters you need in digital photography are polarizers and ND filters.Nope, it's three. A strong UV filter is needed at high altitude, to avoid UV affecting the blue channel. The problem of light that our eyes cannot see adding to the blue channel can actually be worse than it was with film.I don't see a need for either one here.Agreed. Trinity Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re Image resolution, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Image resolution, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Image resolution, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Image resolution, ChrisB |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |