I’m sure that you’re right, Chuck, but what makes it better for you? I
couldn’t really see a difference (and I do have my specs on).
Chris
> On 3 May 16, at 03:01, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I agree, the f/5.6 image is a bit better.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 5/2/2016 7:44 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
>>
>> The easiest way to discern the differences among these photos is to compare
>> the blur of the green leaf behind the flower. I am not unhappy with the
>> straight shot at f11 (first one), but I like the blur better in the focus
>> stacked images, especially the one using f5.6.
>>
>> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=19981
>>
>>
>> One pretty catteyla--nice job. The background was never really very busy
>> and the straight shot quite nice, so assume you are quite fastidious indeed
>> to focus stack that one--the process should be very useful in the future
>> though.
>>
>> I have a few cattelyas and a some Brasso-cattleya plants--the flowers are
>> great put the plants rather homely--Marnie banishes them to the tanks in the
>> basement sans flowers.
>> They are very very pretty but last only a week or two unlike the Paphs or
>> Phrags. Whether they are worth the work or not, I can't say.
>>
>> Mike
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|