Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Where we were - and PanaLeica 100-400 images

Subject: Re: [OM] Where we were - and PanaLeica 100-400 images
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:53:20 -0700
On 4/28/2016 5:04 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
Many to like there.

Thanks!

Impressive the way one can isolate a subject with that 100-400.

Every time I look at #3 (4213), it just knocks me out. Not just visually, but in some bodily reaction way. It's a perspective to be had no other way, and shows that peak quite differently than in the panos. It looks so powerful, and the lines are so strong . . . The yellow is fields of wildflowers.

I do like the effect in 4286

Silk purse and sow's ear. :-) I was lazy, shot from the car, across Carol's side, and caught some bright, very OOF foreground flora. I decided to use the effect.

and the tumble weed shot with heat effect is very nice indeed.  I wonder if it 
were really that hot?

Only got into the high 80s, as I recall. I think the wide range of surface colors and reflectances may contribute to particularly busy air small area movements near the ground and lack of wind left them intact. In higher temps later at Anza-Borrego, I don't think the effect was as strong. The range to the East is the Temblors, as the San Andreas Fault runs along this side of it. That to the West is the Calientes (Hots). I don't want to be there in real summer.

Still shivering, Mike

We've treated a Mainer and family from Brooklyn to spring here so far. ;-)


Grateful Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz