Re: [OM] PANO: More people - BW this time

[Chuck Norcutt]

Well, I certainly agree that Hugin is more work to use than Photoshop. 
On the other hand, Photoshop doesn't always get it right on complex 
panos.  I'll continue to use Photoshop until it fails and use Hugin when 
Photoshop can't do the job.  I have another very large multi-row pano 
taken about 5 years ago that PS didn't stitch properly.  I'll have Hugin 
take a stab at that one too.
Chuck Norcutt


On 4/23/2016 4:14 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 4/22/2016 8:51 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> > What are you using to stitch? Have you tried Hugin?
> Just downloaded and tried it. For a straightforward five shot pano, it
> gave essentially the same result as PS, although much smaller, which I
> suppose to be operator error of some sort.
>
> But the work flow was greater. In PS, I can just select the ORFs and PS
> runs them through ACR, loads, aligns and merges them directly. For
> Hugin, I had to convert the ORFs, output TIFFs, then load the TIFFs in
> Hugin. Not hard, but took much more time.
>
> > <http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/overview/en.shtml>
> > <http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/index.shtml>
> > <https://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/?source=typ_redirect>
> >
> > It solves things Photoshop can't.
> Well, now I have it ready, if such a thing arises. I have not, so far,
> done the multiple row thing. I go portrait orientation and set the FL to
> get all the land and sky I want and shoot one row. I suppose that means
> I can't blow it up to as large a wall, but I don't think that matters. :-)
>
> One Tier Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/