Subject: | Re: [OM] OM 135/2.8 and 1st photos of 2016 |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:57:53 -0800 |
I guess it was the weight I was remembering not the size. It was a long
time ago. Perhaps also the slimmer waist of the m42 mount? Is that true?
Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: It's Cold in the Mid-South, Mike Lazzari |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Flowers of the day with 35mm, ChrisB |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM 135/2.8 and 1st photos of 2016, philippe.amard |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM 135/2.8 and 1st photos of 2016, Mike Gordon via olympus |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |