Glow would either be a smidgen of gaussian blur, or actual "glow" added
with something such as On1.
--Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/18/2015 8:50 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>
>> Just to be contrary, I wouldn't go for sharpening, I'd go with a touch of
>> glow and maybe rack down the clarity a bit.
>>
>
> That intrigued me. I've added a couple of versions. First Clarity of -33
> for the original. I like what it does to the light/contrast. I did the same
> to the previously final one, with modest sharpening to all of her and a bit
> more for eyes and mouth. Dose the same nice things to the light, but with
> clearer detail. <
> http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Wajsman/Isabelle.htm>
>
> I might try glow, too, but don't know what you are using. I'm not aware of
> having any Glow slider.
>
> Glow Less Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|