That's a surprise. Just look at all the old 70mm primes out there. :-)
Actually, I've always wondered about that hole in the typical lens
lineup. We have 24, 50, 90/100, 200, 400. We also have 17/18, 35,
70... oops 85, 135, 250/300, 500/600... wait, why was 70mm always left out?
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/21/2015 3:15 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
The 35mm 4/3 lens is definitely worth the try. I'm not loving it
because 70mm equivalent focal length is my fish/fowl thing. Too long
to be short, too short to be long. Just an unloved focal length for
me.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|