Le 30 nov. 2015 à 00:46, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> But, Moose is mostly correct, since the mirrors are NOT in the path from the
> lens to the film.
I've had a dozen reflexes or more and never noticed the mirror was in the way
"to the film" when actually shooting.
Should I read "to the eye"?
It was used for composition and focus just as in the RFs.
;-)
Calling an M mirror less is anyhow probably excessive.
The goodness about real mirrorless is that the display automatically adapts to
the level of light for you to compose more easily.
You were nearly as blind with an M as with an R in that respect.
Amities
Shoot in available Philippe
> They are only in the focusing mechanism of the viewfinder.
>
> At least that is true for my IIIa and IIIf, dating as early as 1935.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> On 11/29/2015 5:17 PM, Moose wrote:
>> On 11/29/2015 8:45 AM, Philippe wrote:
>>> Le 29 nov. 2015 à 11:03, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> And the earlier, screw mount bodies, all rangefinders, all mirrorless.
>>> Well, I'm unsure about that. Focussing was assisted by "mirrors" since
>>> 1932, at least in their RF system(s) ;-)
>>
>> I sit corrected. ;-)
>>
>> Amuse A. Moose
>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|