Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMGS: SL with 35/2.0 Summicron M Lens

Subject: Re: [OM] IMGS: SL with 35/2.0 Summicron M Lens
From: Tina Manley <images@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:11:07 -0500
I'll be 70 in less than a month!  I was worried about the size and weight,
but the camera balances perfectly.  With the small M lenses on it, it's not
much larger than the M240.  It's the 24-90 lens that is honking big and
heavy but it's worth if for the stabilization and relatively fast speed.
I'm sure Leica will be coming out with more auto-focus lenses that are
smaller but in the meantime, I'm working out at the Y.

Tina

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, AF is a boon for older eyes, although I shouldn’t have thought that
> you were old enough to worry yet, Tina.  My eyes aren’t bad, so far, but AF
> is a boon nonetheless.
>
> What about the bulk and weight of the SL, though?
>
> Anyway, good luck with using it more seriously for your trade.
>
> Chris
>
> > On 28 Nov 15, at 22:42, Tina Manley <images@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > And I'm head over heels in love with it.  All of the Leica quality I'm
> used
> > to and auto-focus, too.  This camera came along at just the right time
> for
> > me as my eyes get older and I'm able to justify the expense.  I'd be glad
> > to post a full-sized DNG file somewhere if anybody wants to examine the
> > nits.  I just tried bracketing with the sunset.  I pressed the shutter
> and
> > in the time it zipped off 3 shots so fast I thought I had made a mistake
> > and only taken one.  The shutter is so quiet.  I can't wait to take this
> > camera on a trip.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 5:15 PM, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> I feel no such conflict.  I’ve had a quick look at the galleries on DPR
> >> and they results look indifferent.  Tina’s samples are of her livestock
> etc
> >> . . . and are too small to make a judgement, although they look better
> than
> >> DPR’s shots.
> >>
> >> My quarrel with the designers at Leica would be aesthetic; the camera
> >> looks rather like a Cold War relic.  It’s huge and poorly balanced,
> >> visually at least, and the cost is a joke.  I’ve never fancied Leicas
> as I
> >> have always thought that Ms were over-sized anyway, but the SL looks
> daft.
> >>
> >> So, even if the results were magical, I couldn’t envisage liking the
> thing.
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley
http://
<http://t.sidekickopen29.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=b071ee85-17eb-4ba3-f069-72cc597d6623>
www.tinamanley.com
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz