Subject: | Re: [OM] LEDs R Us |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:23:31 -0700 |
I agree Chuck. But there are a couple of gaps in the mountain range here that are conveniently located near large dams. In some places it does make sense. In most places though the subsidies just make it an expensive and huge blight on the landscape. The subsidized large solar arrays in the desert are similarly both destructive and expensive. What ever happened to individual rooftop arrays? Even now the cost of batteries isn't so bad compared with the cost of the subsidies and distribution. Even without and/or inadequate storage it would lessen the load on the net.Wind is a bad economic decision. .... The distribution system is actually the most expensive part .... M -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] LEDs R Us, Mike Lazzari |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Hurricane Patricia Aftermath, Mike Lazzari |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] LEDs R Us, Mike Lazzari |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Renewable energy, batteries, etc. was: LEDs R Us, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |