Subject: | Re: [OM] Don't trust all you read on the internet |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:31:25 -0400 |
And he is probably relating f/16 vs. f/11 to increased exposure time and
therefore diffraction must be caused by longer exposure. :-)
Some day he'll be corrected. Chuck Norcutt On 9/21/2015 2:09 PM, Moose wrote: On 9/20/2015 11:39 PM, Wayne Harridge wrote:I came across this strange misconception about exposure time and diffraction: " I try to stick with an aperture of around f8 and not go higher than f11, meaning I try to keep the aperture close to the sweet spot of my lens, so I can capture the clearest and sharpest image I can capture. This is important in long exposure since the longer the exposure the more the RAW file will be exposed to diffraction (which happens at apertures of f16 or more) a phenomenon that deteriorates the clarity of the images."It's because the writer doesn't know what diffraction is, only that it's a bad thing. Diffracted Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] New Photo: Ivan, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Don't trust all you read on the internet, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Don't trust all you read on the internet, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Don't trust all you read on the internet, Piers Hemy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |