Nice touch, Moose. I will try to keep that in mind next time.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 8/26/2015 4:16 PM, Moose wrote:
On 8/26/2015 12:38 PM, ChrisB wrote:
It’s a lovely creature, Jim, but the photo looks strangely
two-dimensional to my eyes. Perhaps it’s the shallow depth of field,
but also the colour of the wings looks a little flat. Have you
sharpened it or something, perhaps going a little far?
I believe what you are seeing is that old bugbear of Moose's, blown
red channel. Subtle differences of colour and brightness that form the
texture of the surface all become the visually same colour and
brightness, with the result of a flat looking, undifferentiated
surface. The histogram here shows a huge spike at the top.
Fortunately, whatever caused that effect squished the high values
together at the top, only truly lopping off a relatively few pixels.
Those may well be a result of using the relatively low DR E-510 at
slightly too high an exposure.
This may be a little overdone for some tastes, or too dark, etc.,
which could be done differently. But I think it shows how much tonal
detail was missing and how it needn't be flat looking.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Nichols/Gulf_Fritillary.htm>
3D Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|