On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I will practice a lot more this summer. It also is becoming increasingly
>
>> obvious to me that I need a copy of FM.
>>
>
> Getting it right in the first place is always better. These demonstrations
> I did are only to give an idea of what I'm talking about, not substitutes
> for the real thing.
>
> Deconvolution is better for most such work than USM. I use FM because it's
> what I understand and am used to. There are a couple of other deconvolution
> apps that may have finer adjustments and may work better with LR and other
> editors lacking layers.
>
> Nuanced Edges Moose
>
>
I understand - it's the same thing in audio. "Fix it in the Mix" is mostly
a myth. The better solution is to record it better to start with. However,
once in a while, you get something that didn't turn out the way it looked
while chimping, and I've seen some amazing stuff done with FM.
--
Paul Braun WD9GCO
Certified Music Junkie
"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Berthold Auerbach
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|