I agree.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 5/30/2015 7:15 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
Looks like a nice architectural lens too.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/29/2015 4:46 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
Thanks for looking and commenting, Chris. I just felt the fast lenses
were too heavy and expensive for my daily activities, and this better
served my needs. We'll see.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 5/29/2015 3:39 PM, ChrisB wrote:
Yes, I’d like a 27/2.8 as well, Jim. And that looks photo validates
my desire.
Chris
On 29 May 15, at 21:25, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've been looking at options for an inconspicuous walk-around camera
with full features. I'm happy with the Fuji X-E1 camera body, but
the kit lens is too large for daily use. Reviews of the Fujinon
27/2.8 Pancake are glowing, except for the price. I was able to snag
one at 38% off list, new, from Japan. It arrived today and I wanted
to see what a few quick shots could tell me.
I selected this shot to examine distortion and detail, in my back
yard. I did my usual tuning to the RAF file, converted it to TIFF,
then resized it for the LUG gallery. No other cropping, noise
reduction or sharpening were applied. I am quite pleased with what I
see.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Fujinon+27mm+uncropped+unprocessed.tif.html
<http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Fujinon+27mm+uncropped+unprocessed.tif.html>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|