I love it when you guys talk dirty.
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
YNWA
> On 09 May 2015, at 23:28, Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
>>> Adobe doesn't like fuji x-files much.
>
>
> Yes, Adobe's Raw conversion used to be awful, but is now just OK. C1 is
> better as far as I can tell. In cam conversion is very good.
>
> CFA's have trade offs by nature. Xtrans designed so the "green" raw channel
> has more coverage but less positional symmetry than in a Bayer sensor and as
> a direct result there is less high-frequency luminance "miscalculations" in
> the interpolation, giving lower noise in raw conversion. The larger B to B
> and R to R distances necessitate a large chroma smoothing radius resulting in
> "watercolor effects or artifacts--balance seems different with different
> converters. Accuraw allows one to adjust the balance though have never used
> it.
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/accuraw/
>
> I have read it may be possible to use a POCS algorithm to minimize the
> complications of the uneven channel coverage but have not seen any evidence
> that anyone is working on it.
>
> Mike
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|