The Mamiya 6 is more state of the art than anything else mentioned here,
incl. om3 | 28 f/2.
It¹s lenses still hold their own against anything (well, except maybe the
Mamiya 7 lenses. ;-) and results from Mamiya 6/7 film easily trumps any
digital I have seen. Talking about prints here, optically printed, not
scanned results (which are always inferior, at least at sizes I work with).
I favor the Mamiya 7 over the 6, though the 6 is still great. I like 6x7
better, plus the whole system is newer and more available, and has more
lenses, etc.
-Ed
On 4/22/15, 6:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>If it works for you, then no reason to update to the newest thing. I?m
>shooting everything these days with a Mamiya 6 and a Canon 5mkII. Both
>?outdated? (especially the Mamiya) but they do what I want. I have the
>complete Mamiya 6 lens system, but would like to get a couple more lenses
>for my Canon. Aside from that, I don?t need or want anything else, though
>I do wish I could use my OM-4T bodies again
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|