Re: [OM] 4/3 format is lousy for portraits - dof

[Chuck Norcutt]

Also a wow.

Chuck Norcutt


On 4/12/2015 2:04 PM, philippe.amard wrote:
> Le 12 avr. 15 à 16:55, Ken Norton a écrit :
>
> > Chuck,
> >
> > Here is an example of why you can't use 4/3 for portraiture. You just
> > can't get a narrow DoF.
> >
> > http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=506&Itemid=1
> Wow!
>
>
> Here's my contribution to the cause: full portrait and DOF
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/Pivoine-Fourmi-2.jpg.html
>
>
> Amities
> Philippe
>
>
> > -- Ken Norton
> > ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.zone-10.com
> > -- _________________________________________________________________
> > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to
> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
> NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/