I agree on both counts, Mike: Moose’s hat and his photogeneity (new word, could
have been photogenicity). I do like hats, and Moose’s beard fills the frame
nicely :-).
And I like that shot of Marnie.
Chris
> On 13 Mar 15, at 22:45, Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I really do like the new Moose hat obtained at Nepenthe in Big Sur. Moose is
> quite photogenic, IMO. The DZ 45/1.8 does work quite well for portraits
> though what I have seen of the 42.5/1.2 Panny-Leica Nocticron, the latter is
> a bit better with smoother bokeh, though at a premium price as well as
> size/weight considerations. It does have the aperture control (doesn't seem
> to work on Oly bodies) but has OIS too if required.
>
> I fell down on the job by not shooting one of Marnie. I had the Cosina
> Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 SL-I with me and a nice flash which is great for
> portraits, but sometimes a bit to sharp even wide open. I often take it or
> the Z. 85mm/f2 on trips. The CV has better bokeh with the background at about
> 10ft then the Z. 85, but both are very nice. Here is one of Marnie from a
> recent trip with the CV90 at f3.5 and fill flash:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/lptph9o <http://tinyurl.com/lptph9o>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|