Serious infractions might cause you an infarction...
On 17/02/2015, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For the most part, I agree, Moose, but when it matters (although I can’t
> think of an example) it would be good to have the correct case to make
> something easier to read.
>
> I must confess to being almost obsessive about grammar, to the point where I
> find it difficult to read further if I come across repeated infractions of
> simple rules.
>
> Chris
>
>> On 17 Feb 15, at 01:00, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> And the case is, I think, that there is little or no ambiguity as to whom
>> is being referred to by 'who' for both cases in common usage. ;-)
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|