"Of course"
and
"sigh"
;-)
Amities
Philippe
Le 24 janv. 2015 à 20:46, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> On 1/24/2015 5:58 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Had this been pointed out earlier there'd have been no need of finding the
>> automated solution. :-)
>
> Sorry. I thought this was obvious, so just let the thread go nattering on
> without commenting. You have to be responsible for your own photographic
> equipment knowledge at least some of the time. :-)
>
> Think about it. Does any program do pano stitching directly with Raw? Sounds
> really tricky to get the RGGB pixels lined up, compared to lining up
> individual RGB pixels. PS certainly doesn't. It requires Raw input files to
> be saved in a converted format before working on them.
>
> You are certainly not going to find a camera that does it directly on Raw
> files, unless/until their processors become much more powerful in the future.
> Even then, do you want the camera processor baking in it's decisions for you?
> PS creates masked levels for each input file, so one may correct its
> decisions as necessary.
>
> I have, and have had, several cameras with built-in pano capability, but have
> thought of it as another silly selling point, compared to post processed
> panos. Likewise, some camera or other recently added the ability to clone out
> unwanted things, but with shoddy results and JPEG only.
>
> Hard Way Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|