On 12/29/2014 5:40 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
This evening:
<http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Dec14/MtYoung_011.JPG>
Lovely.
Seems easier to make this 14-150 flare.
If this is an example, it's sure not bad. If one wants to even out the exposure side to side, a layer with lower
brightness may be put above the base, a diagonal, partial gradient applied to a mask on the upper layer,then paint mask
to taste. Yeah, I know, that's PS talk, and easy there, not LR or whatever.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Mike/MtYoung.htm>
I left the warmish tone on the left, as appropriate to the approaching sunset
light. That would be easy to change.
I also seem to be shooting hard up against the stop at the 14mm end.
Yes, I do remember often wishing for a little more width. But then, that also
happens with the 12-50, but not as much.
Probably the 9-18 will be the one on the camera most of the time
Wouldn't work for me.
until my perfect 10~65 comes out ;)
Yeah, yeah! When's that? Where do I pre-order?
Kinda annoying how slavish lens designers (or their bosses) seem to be. Canon's big gun after the kit lenses for FF is
24-105, so many smaller format lenses have the same FoVs. 28-200 was a common superzoom back in film days, then 28-300,
mostly led by Tamron, so Oly makes a 4/3 equivalent.
Interestingly, my two latest casual/special purpose cameras go fairly wide. The waterproof, and generally tough guy, Oly
TG-850 goes to 21 mm eq., although the long end is a little short at 105. The Panny ZS40 is 24-720, not quite as wide,
but probably long enough. ;-) Neither is suitable for this kind of landscape, though. Well, the ZS40 would come pretty
close, as long as display doesn't get any larger.
Which Lens Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|