It looks good to me. I’m now starting to wonder about the serviceability of
the engine. Will it still work?
Chris
> On 28 Dec 14, at 06:51, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think FastStone is a great viewer and a very limited editor, with few, not
> particularly good tools. I think it takes more than a minute to improve a
> shot like that, but a great improvement may be made.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/BSwale/Boat_Rear.htm
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/BSwale/Boat_Rear.htm>>
>
> I know it's always a risk to post quick and dirty illustrative shots here.
> Someone(s) is are bound to treat them as serious images and find fault. :-)
> The faults are there, of course, but are they worth bothering about? Enough
> may be done in PS in under a minute with one tool (LR I don't know well
> enough to say.) that no one would likely have commented on IQ. Going about
> half as far in FS might have sneaked by.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|