You can make up for width by shooting a pano. It's a lot tougher to
make up for the long end.
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/9/2014 11:37 AM, Paul Braun wrote:
I guess I'm trying to decide if having the long end (600mm EQ) or the short end
(18mm EQ) will benefit me the most. Plus the 9-18 is $100 more. Tough choice.
Eventually I want both, though, which would give me pretty much gapless
coverage from 9-300 in native u43 glass.
Paul Braun
Certified Music Junkie
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever." -- David St. Hubbins
"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life" - Berthold Auerbach
On Dec 8, 2014, at 23:10, Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This lens is working out just fine!
http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Dec14/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|