On 12/8/2014 9:10 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
This lens is working out just fine!
http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Dec14/
Nice!
Glad you like it. Sure fits your style.
There seems to be a tendency for people to assume that the diminutive size and light weight of many Oly µ4/3 lenses mean
they aren't that good. Mostly excellent optically, though. Although it doesn't go as wide as the Canon 10-22 for APS-C,
the 9-18 approaches infinitely smaller and lighter and is, I think optically as good.
The 45/1.8 and 60/2.8 Macro are other primes that are small and light, and
dyno-mite optically.
Comparative Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|