I have Photokit Sharpeners and use the Capture Sharpen but not the Output
Sharpen. It probably does the same thing you do. I haven't had a failure
since 2009, but I have some that have been pending for 5 days which is way
longer than normal. I'm afraid I might have overlooked something and have
a failure coming :-(
Tina
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Well, my Autumn shots (4 of them) were rejected for “Soft or lacking
> definition”. Sigh!
>
> It's a catch-22 situation. They tell you to not use any sharpening,
> but if you don't add sharpening, you'll get dinged for this. Why?
> Because everybody else DOES sharpen. The key to survival, that I've
> found, is to sharpen to give pixel clarity, but with absolutely NO
> halos. If you have any halos of any sort, you should be pounded into
> dust. When in doubt, I sharpen to the point where I just barely see an
> artifact and back it off a bit. It's better to be on the soft side of
> sharp than have artifacts. If you have halos or sharpening artifacts,
> you will be put on their sh** list forever.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|