Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Sunrise, Moonset |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:06:14 -0400 |
I have never used an "arbitrarily defined spread" and neither should
you. I compute my own CoC and get exactly what I want.
Chuck Norcutt On 10/23/2014 1:07 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote: But I think what he doesn't understand is that the marked zone is definitely not arbitrary.It is arbitrary in the sense that before even beginning to talk about hyperfocal one has to define what's sharp enough to to fit within the ticks on the dial. Improvements in the technology have made it necessary to consider tightening up that arbitrarily defined spread. I consider it confining to think of it in "binary" terms. (Thank you Piers) I'm not demeaning "hyperfocal". Of course some may consider it to be a useful tool still. Especially if they were rethink the original starting point. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Birches?, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Binary DoF, Mike Gordon via olympus |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Sunrise, Moonset, Mike Lazzari |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Sunrise, Moonset, Mike Lazzari |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |