Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Sunrise, Moonset |
---|---|
From: | "Sawyer, Edward" <Ed.Sawyer@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:11:03 +0000 |
Hyperfocal has nothing to do with the capture medium, film or digital. It's most definitely an optical thing, and will continue to exist forever. It's not a subjective thing, it's objective fact. On 10/21/14 3:28 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Well maybe it was the limitations of the media and >equipment of the day. I think that "hyperfocal" is a carryover from the >past that may not have much relevance with today's technology. The >hyperfocal spread is shrinking as the technology improves to the point >where it becomes meaningless. Maybe that's why the markings disappeared. > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Sunrise, Moonset, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Cheesy old Sci-Fi (hijacked from Re: Nathan's PAD 15/10/2014: supermarket parking lot), Chris Trask |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Sunrise, Moonset, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Sunrise, Moonset, Piers Hemy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |