Re: [OM] B&W challenge, #3

[Moose]

On 10/11/2014 6:40 AM, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Thank you all for your comments on
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=14678
> and
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=14684
>
> Well, both Chris people encouraged me, but, out of sight
> of all, Chris Crawford took the much appreciated extra
> step of e-mailing me off-list with re-working of my
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=14678
>
> I do not have PS as he has, but I'm now at the stage of
> my familiarity with FastStone that in some ways it is just
> like another hand, and about as fast. And I've paid for it!
This has been bugging me. The first one is indeed awfully flat. But the rework has gone nuclear, blasting foliage and 
shadow into the netherworld, wiping out textural detail in the columns and the lighter parts of the front of the 
building proper. I offer some alternatives. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/BSwale/Masonic_Lodge_Clyde.htm>
I couldn't get myself to go as far white as you did. Even my alternative 3 seems unrealistic looking to me, as it's 
obviously not direct sun.
 A Whiter Shade of Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/