I know what you mean, Ian, about the difference between the X-Pro1 and the
X-T1. But I'll discard neither of them.
That's a rather splendid shot of the bench and ridge opposite.
I'm off to Lossiemouth tomorrow, on a work visit; I hope to get some decent
Scots scenery captured between work appointments.
I'd better ask Piers to book the decent weather . . .
Chris
On 22 Sep 14, at 11:15, SwissPace <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments, it was more than 500 yards from the car, we
> walked about an hour up to the restaurant (but you could drive it - but then
> the food and drink doesn't taste as good) and we passed this spot when
> walking back down using another route after about 30 minutes of walking. It
> was taken with the XT-1 and 35/1.4 and processed with silver efex 2 using one
> of the default presets. With Silver Efex 2 I usually just skim through the
> presets and stop at the first one that looks right and that's it, sometimes I
> skim through but usually I go back to my first choice anyway so have stopped
> bothering.
>
> While the XT-1 is a better camera functionally and usage wise I am not yet
> fully convinced it delivers better quality images than the X-pro1, I a on
> "Holiday" with Cai and the dog next week in north wales so maybe I will have
> time to compare them although I would probably not swap back to the X-Pro1 as
> main camera whatever the result.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|