Brian - this mailing list does not support any sort of typeface choice or
formatting - it's simply ascii text.
Different mail readers may make some display formatting, for example showing
quoted text in colour, or interpreting asterisks as *bold* or underscores as
_underlined_ text, but you can't do much to influence it from the sending end.
Jez
> On 10 Sep 2014, at 11:55, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>
> Trying this again - don't know, for the world of me, what screwed up
> the layout in the last digest.
> I'm passing this through notepad just in
> case there are other formatting influences at work.
> Or maybe it's my
> choice of Courier Sans that's doing it ...
> Thanks for the comments also,
> to Chuck. It goes on display this weekend whether it will sell, or
> not...
>
> Bob Whitmire wrote
>
> Very pleasant. Should make a nice print.
>
>
> --Bob Whitmire
> Certified Neanderthal
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 6:38 AM,
> bj@xxxxxxxxxxxx.nzwrote:
> Trying portraits for a shop-front exhibition
> for the local Spring Blossom day. Here's one ...
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=14335
> DZ 50/2 still under
> test
> Brian
> /////////////////////
> Thanks, Bob. I'm hoping so. I bought a
> couple pf bunches of daffodils at the local supermarket (to provide
> variety and to avoid ravaging the few we have in our garden) and am
> trying several compositions to provide a range of choice for
> display.
> And I'm giving this lens a work-out to test its strengths and
> weaknesses. Auto-focus is an advantage over my mainstay lenses which are
> all manual focus except for the DZ 35.3.5 macro (and the DZ 14~54 which
> also close-focuses) , and given my increasing poverty of eyesight.
> I
> suspect that some of the manual-focus lenses are sharper.
> My fleet
> includes; OM 135/4 on manual telescopic tube ( and the 80mm which I have
> not tried yet), the 50/3.5 Zuiko macro, the amazing 55/2.8 Panagor, the
> Sigma 90/2.8, and the Zuiko 100/2 which focuses as close as 70 cm.
> One
> thing I have found with the E-3 is that shutter speeds slower than about
> 1/20 second are to be avoided like the plague even though I am using
> tripod. Without an external stabilising weight (which I have not tried)
> there is excessive loss of definition which in part must be due to
> vibration. For some shots the tripod has been sitting on thick carpet,
> or on "soft" forest floor.
> Brian
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|