Yeah, I'd much rather have a full-frame version of the E-M1. But,
lacking that, just the E-M1.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/9/2014 11:07 AM, Sawyer, Edward wrote:
There's no cost effectiveness at all: you have to buy and butcher not only
some sort of digital body, but also a film bodyŠ then there's the labor
and fab to merge them togetherŠ
fun: well, building stuff is certainly fun, but there's a difference
between building for the sake of building, and actually building something
useful/better to go out and take pictures with.
On 9/9/14 6:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cost savings, fun and funky factor of using OM1 OM3 daily hockey puck
built cameras vs delicate DSLRs basics cost effectiveness
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|