On 7/7/2014 7:29 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
Stubby Moose wrote:
Indeed it would. For me, it would confirm that what I'm shooting is closer
to perfection. ;-)
BTW, the following really has nothing to do with the post to which the above was a response. AG has hijacked a thread
about aspects of perfectionism, etc., taking my comment out of a context in which it means something entirely different
than he makes it appear here - to justify another rant against those attached to "New, Shiny".
Likely true. At least for this year. Next year, the latest/greatest
will reveal just how horrible the current "near perfection" is. Oh,
wait, that's already happened. The E-M1 smokes E-M5s three at a time.
OK, I'll bite, again. I must assume you are talking features and ergonomics,
not actual image IQ.
I've done it before, when the E-M1 was new, and have just done it again, carefully comparing the two using DPReview's
side-by-side image comparator. Interestingly, they are not quite the same on different parts of the test image.
Sometimes identical, sometimes one ever so slightly better at 100% on one part, sometimes the other on another part.
From base ISO to ISO 3200, there just isn't a penny's worth of difference
between them in simple image quality.
The E-M1 has yet to smoke my E-M5.
What are you smoking?
Curious Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|