Keep it light. OM 3 Ti, 24mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, 100mm f2.8 and set of
extension tubes. Longer stuff use digital. Bill "Who is thinking lighter"
Barber
OK, so we have one vote for the OM-4T and two for the OM-3Ti.
I'm torn between the 24/2.8 and 28/2.
I'll do the 50/1.4 instead of the 35-80 because of the filters.
I'm leaning towards the 100/2 over the 100/2.8 because it's just a
tiny bit better and I'm likely to do some astro stuff with the digital
camera.
Yes, I do have a vehicle, so I'm tempted to just haul the entire kit
with me, but I know how that usually works out. I do plan on two
bags--the Canon Backpack is my "go kit" and I'll have another bag with
the campsite kit containing the 100-300, chargers and boxes of film.
I'm thinking that I'll use the OM-3Ti as my primary kit and have the
OM-4T spared in the campsite bag. That way, I could use the OM-4T for
some long-exposure stuff where I can let the OTF do its thing.
Go kit: DMC-L1 with 14-45 (not 50), OM adapter. OM-3Ti with 4-rolls of
film in my plastic holder, 100/2, 50/1.4, and either 24/2.8 or 28/2.
Filters, cable release and my hiking tripod.
Car kit: Chargers, Tokina 100-300/4 zoom, Sekonic L508 meter, film, spare body.
The one other loose end is the MD2. I really, really prefer using the
MD2 as it really helps with shutter-shock blurring. I get
substantially sharper pictures on the tripod when I use the MD2.
I have to inventory the film to see what all is available, but I think
most of the film will be rebranded Kodak Plus-X with various 400 speed
films available.