Oops! I had suspected about that since some typeset were added but I still
missed it.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I think that Philippe has been making humorous points the whole time, CH.
Certainly I think that this is a humorous photo.
Chris
On 5 Aug 14, at 09:45, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So RAW can reduce camera shake?
WB adjustment can be done with post processing, auto WB usually gives
better image for post processing. But I agree RAW is much easier to
adjust.
Noise? I haven't seen good NR with RAW converters, I use Neat Image. Make
sure your camera set at zero sharpen.
Artifacts? Agree, there is JPEG artifacts but at high quality JPEG
setting, the artifacts shouldn't be a problem.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 4:16 PM
Subject: [OM] OT: RAW shot as JPEG
The final answer?
This straight out of the camera JPEG contains, noise, awful WB, camera
shake, artifacts, name it, it's there.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Shooting-RAW-_amp_-High-ISO.jpg.html
Amities
I think I've learned better since Philippe
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
