Re: [OM] The virtues of RAW

[C.H.Ling]

I have also seen some here and also pointed it out but not my own images.

C.H.Ling


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I have definitely seen posterization.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 8/4/2014 7:52 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> > I always use 16bit for editing but I have to admit that I never seen any
> > banding or posterization when editing my 8bit camera JPEG.
> >
> > C.H.Ling
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > > > I did, I did.  I wasn’t reading carefully enough . . .
> > > > > You missed the tongue-in-cheek.  He did indeed carry out a lot of
> > > > > dodging and burning... AKA post-processing.
> > > Post-processing is NOT the same as raw conversion vs JPEG. If a person
> > > is doing serious bit-bending, then yes, it does make sense to start
> > > out with as many bits as possible. But let's be honest with ourselves
> > > and admit that rarely do we ever bend them enough to make them squeal
> > > in pain.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/