I'm not suspicious. A very small camera and very short focal length
makes for great depth of field. Even if the eagle wasn't shot in that
exact position it was still taken with the camera just above the eagle
while it was in flight somewhere. I have no reason to suppose the
background is staged.
Chuck Norcutt
On 7/13/2014 5:03 PM, John Hudson wrote:
What are the chances that this is a patch and paste image courtesy of
Photoshop ?
The lack of any blurring amongst the bird's feathers and the clarity of
the distant scenery make me suspicious.
jh
On 7/13/2014 1:12 PM, Chris Trask wrote:
Came across this on the BBC News website:
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28262942
Chris
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
- Hunter S. Thompson
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|