Le 14 juil. 2014 à 20:00, Tina Manley <images@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> ALL of the out of focus errors with the Fuji were caused by a switch or
> button or lens collar moving to a different position by itself. The manual
> focus switch on the front, the aperture ring, the manual/auto focus collar
> on the lenses, the exposure controls all moved too easily, especially
> bouncing in the back of a truck or messed with by curious kids. I got so
> paranoid that I had to check every setting before I took a photo;
> therefore, I used the Leicas more and more on the trip.
>
And yet we all know how extra careful you are with the gear Tina ;-)
http://www.blurb.fr/b/1896084-lug-yearbook-2010-fifth-anniversary
Amitiés
Philippe
> Tina
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> The focus (or oof) rate is very interesting.
>> My observation with autofocus has always been that unless I take a long
>> time making sure the autofocus sensor is exactly where I wish focus to
>> fall, or I am using a slowish zoom, stopped down, autofocus shots often
>> disappoint by not quite having focus where I want it.
>> Is this the possibly why you rejected so many of the Fuji shots, or were
>> they mainly macro (which almost always have some oof problems IME...). Or
>> is it just me who hasn't mastered autofocus for anything other than
>> quicksilver grandchildren!
>> Frank D
>>
>> On 13 Jul, 2014, at 22:25, Tina Manley <images@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> PESO:
>>>
>>> This is the kind of thing you can research when you have LR ;-)
>>>
>>> I have finally finished editing all of the photos from Honduras. I took
>>> 1839 photos in all: 869 with the Fuji, 549 with the M240, and 411 with
>> the
>>> MM.
>>>
>>> Of those, I deleted 243 that were out of focus: 206 with the Fuji, 23
>> with
>>> the M240, and 14 with the MM.
>>>
>>> From the remaining, I gave my highest rating of 4 stars to 103 photos: 33
>>> with the Fuji, 22 with the M240, and 48 with the MM.
>>>
>>> Of the 7 lenses I used, the ones that did the best were the Leica 35/2.0,
>>> Leica 50/1.4, and Leica 90/2.0.
>>>
>>> What I have concluded is that I love the results I get with the MM. I
>> will
>>> be carrying it more often in the future, along with those three lenses.
>>>
>>> I'm not giving up on the Fuji, but it certainly did not solve my focusing
>>> problem and I was encouraged by the number that I did get in focus with
>> the
>>> Leicas! Maybe all of that focusing I did with the Auto-refractor helped
>> ;-)
>>>
>>> I hope this is interesting to some. It was invaluable to me. I'll be
>>> posting some of the 4's next week.
>>>
>>> Tina
>>> --
>>> Tina Manley
>>> http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
>>> http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Tina Manley
> http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
> http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|