Chuck
On the assumption that you included me in that question, my view is that using
Aperture/LR is much easier and simpler than using ACR/Bridge/PS. You import
the files to the application and therefore to the catalogue (or library); in
doing so you generate a preview that is an interpretation of the Raw file; with
that preview you can carry out various operations, just like in ACR but more
far-reaching, but you do not touch the original file. For most of my images I
merely adjust levels and perhaps a little “definition” (Aperture LCE, I think)
and then output the file to email, website or print. The original file remains
in situ, untouched, but you have a product from it that you can use. I think
that LR develop is just like that.
With ACR/Bridge/PS you have to take each image individually and convert them
from Raw. If you use Bridge as a DAM it is probably easier than I am
suggesting, but if you convert each Raw file that you want to use with ACR the
LE/Aperture path is, as I wrote above, much easier and simpler.
Chris
On 4 Jul 2014, at 19:04, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So I ask the two of you, what do you think that you can do in the LR develop
> module that you might not be able to do in PS/Bridge?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> On 7/4/2014 1:47 PM, Jez Cunningham wrote:
>> In recent times I've only used the wimpy ACR in Elements so I can't compare
>> to PS/Bridge, but I love what I can do in the Develop module in LR. And
>> the Print module is excellent.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|