You're lucky! I'd love to have another of these lenses, but I cannot find
one that isn't ruined, and I'm not willing to go to the hassle of buying
and returning 500 of them on eBay whose lying sellers said they were
'minty' just to get one good one. The lens was nice, but not THAT nice.
--
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-437-8990
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook
On 6/29/14 6:29 PM, "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I swear I must have the world's only 65-200 with a pristine rear
>element. The only problem mine has is zoom creep. JH once told me that
>that's adjustable but I've never taken care of it.
>
>Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>On 6/26/2014 3:36 AM, Chris Crawford wrote:
>> The OM 65-200 f4 zoom had the same problem. I have one of them my father
>> bought new when I was a kid. I used to do a lot of photography with it
>> when I was younger, but its worthless now. I've seen several others in
>>the
>> last couple years for sale, and all had the same issue. Sucks, because
>>it
>> was a pretty sharp lens for a 1980's zoom.
>>
>> I shot these with it when I was 15. 23 years ago!
>>
>> http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/chris-details.php?product=866
>>
>> http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/chris-details.php?product=932
>>
>--
>_________________________________________________________________
>Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|