Yes, it made sense to me, Moose. And it’s a subject that we have discussed
several times over the years.
Chris
On 28 Jun 2014, at 20:35, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6/28/2014 9:04 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> And I've copied Ken in this regard for several years ;-)
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 28 Jun 14, at 16:18, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I set mine to a default of daylight WB. It gives me a common starting point
>>> which matches my film scans.
>
> As Moose said. ;-)
>
> Did my post/explanation/samples do any good in showing WHY that's good
> practice?
>
> As I so often show different results of processing, I was afraid people would
> just assume the very different looking colors to be a result of post
> conversion processing. That is NOT the case. All the differences are a result
> of color temperature and tint settings in camera or selected in ACR by the
> user.
>
> Most of the conversions shown in ACR screen shots weren't even completed, as
> I only needed the screen shot to show what it was going to do.
>
> Once one understands that the WB setting DOES affect RAW conversion in all
> common converters, AG's idea of a common starting point, consistent images
> out of the converter, as with film, makes perfect sense.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|