Subject: | Re: [OM] Cars |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 28 Jun 2014 16:57:12 -0500 |
> AIRC this wasn't the case in Los Angeles where the auto industry deliberately > white anted the public transport system, did it not? Horribly oversimplified. Public transportation died pretty much uniformly across the country with two things: Improvements and availability in private automobiles and the improvements and availability in public roads. While GM was party to the demise, the demise was imminent. Public transportation only made sense when the railroads could make a profit doing it. And that profitability was ALWAYS subsidized by mail and freight. The real cost of public transportation is extreme. I believe that one particular rail system in Texas costs the taxpayers something like $250 per passenger beyond the ticket price. Another aspect that changed everything was the moving away from city center centric urban planning. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Cars, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Cars, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Cars, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Cars, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |