No advice, but... to read some of the background behind the TrueCrypt
decison, you might go through some of the recent articles found by:
<http://slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=truecrypt>
Michael
On 14-06-27 11:30 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
Thanks. Those sound like some pretty nasty "features" for a technology
that has been around since probably before Vista. Anyhow, I don't
want full disk encryption (especially of the boot drive) for exactly
the type of problems that you've mentioned. TrueCrypt and FreeOTFE
are able to create a virtual disk which is simply an ordinary file on
the OS. I had assumed that BitLocker could do that as well but
apparently not. It's limited to real hardware but can do removable
drives. That would probably be sufficient but not my preference. So
I'll stay away from BitLocker due to price and function if nothing
else. I was also sad to note that Symantec PGP doesn't work well either.
Anyone else?
Chuck Norcutt
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|