On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> don't know why the 4/3 mount would be as large as the OM mount.
>
>
Grudging sort of homage to Maitani? They kept the option open of making
the E-system backwards compatible to the last moment?
I think we were startled that the E-1 was quite as large as it was, as a
whole, but not that the pie hole was that size. Some of the original
claims for 4/3 were never realized until m43. To get to something like the
E-M5, we had to go through the E-system and the new Pens. Seems almost
Darwinian in hindsight.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|